亚洲农业和农村转型展望(英文版).pdf

返回 相关 举报
亚洲农业和农村转型展望(英文版).pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共167页
亚洲农业和农村转型展望(英文版).pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共167页
亚洲农业和农村转型展望(英文版).pdf_第3页
第3页 / 共167页
亚洲农业和农村转型展望(英文版).pdf_第4页
第4页 / 共167页
亚洲农业和农村转型展望(英文版).pdf_第5页
第5页 / 共167页
亲,该文档总共167页,到这儿已超出免费预览范围,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述
ASIA AND THE PACIFIC DIVISION AN OUTLOOK ON ASIAS AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL TRANSFORMATION Prospects and options for making it an inclusive and sustainable one International Fund for Agricultura l Development Via Paolo di Dono, 44 - 00142 Rome, Italy Tel: +39 06 54591 - Fax: +39 06 5043463 Email: ifadifad ifad twitter/ifad youtube/user/ifadTVfacebook. com/ifad instagram. com/ifadnews linkedin/company/ifadASIA AND THE PACIFIC DIVISION AN OUTLOOK ON ASIAS AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL TRANSFORMATION Prospects and options for making it an inclusive and sustainable one 2019 by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IFAD concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The designations developed and developing countries are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgement about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. All rights reserved ISBN 978-92-9072-879-5 Printed June 2019 Authors: Fabrizio Bresciani, Thomas Chalmers, Dilva Terzano, Raghav Gaiha, Ganesh Thapa, and Nidhi Kaicker Contributors: Roehl Briones, Katsushi S. Imai, Monica Romano, Mary Taylor Reviewers: Doris Capistrano, Roshan Cooke, Kim Khoi Dang, Costanza Di Nucci, Tawfiq El Zabri, Sisira Jayasuriya, Avinash Kishore, Sattar Mandal, Tim Martyn, Sakphouseth Meng, Meera Mishra, Tung Nguyen Thanh, Qaim Shah, Aissa Toure, Marie Van Der Donckt 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6LIGHTS AND SHADOWS OF ASIAS DEVELOPMENT: INCLUSIVE BUT UNSUSTAINABLE 11Setting the stage: achievements and challenges in economic and human development across Asia 11 Natural resource degradation, climate change 26Annex: a note on regional and income-based classifications 45AGRICULTURE, STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATION AND THE GROWING IMPORTANCE OF THE AGRIFOOD SECTOR 47 What do growth and structural transformation tell us about the rural economy? 47 The growing importance of the agrifood sector 53 The rural non-farm economy and the agrifood sector 75ASIAS AGRICULTURAL TRANSFORMATION: UNDERMINING OR FOSTERING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT? 79 Agricultures contribution to the Asias natural resource and ecosystem service degradation 79 From agricultures to agribusinesss role in poverty and malnutrition reduction 89 What role for agriculture and smallholders in the realization of Agenda 2030? 93PROSPECTS FOR SUSTAINING THE TRANSFORMATION OF ASIAS AGRICULTURE AND RURAL ECONOMY 97 Prospects for the rural non-farm economy and employment opportunities 98 Prospects for public and private investment in rural areas 100 Vulnerability of Asias agriculture to climate change 106 Prospects of Asias institutional and policy context in agriculture 111 Conclusions 115ASIAS PATHWAYS TOWARDS AN INCLUSIVE AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL TRANSFORMATION 117 Shifts in development strategies shaping Asias agriculture and rural transformation paradigm 117 Asias differentiated stages in the transformation of agriculture and the rural economy 122 Strategic thrusts for an Asian smallholder-centred agricultural and rural transformation agenda 125 Conclusions 146 REFERENCES 147 CONTENTS 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY If the success of Asian countries in transforming their rural economy is measured by the extent to which poverty has declined over the past 20 years, there is no question that their transformation can be regarded as one of the major achievements in human history. The decline in extreme poverty and hunger has been outstanding and today Asia is making steady progress towards eradicating both by 2030. Contrasting with these bright lights, though, are shadows dimming Asias development performance. Environmental quality has worsened and continues to do so at a rapid pace. The degradation of natural resources has reached worrying levels in most parts of Asia. Vulnerability to climate change is increasing as concentrations of CO 2in the atmosphere increase. Inequality is on the rise, both within rural and urban areas and between them. The gains made in poverty reduction could easily be reversed, as mobility above the poverty line is constrained for too many households and exposure to economic shocks and unstable food markets persists. Malnutrition is overtaking undernourishment in the social development agenda, as diets provide insufficient nutrients for large swathes of the urban and rural population or lead to excessive food consumption patterns. New problems are overtaking the older ones and Asia is now entering a critical part of its history. Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals are challenging propositions for todays policymakers in Asia. Against this background, the question is: what can agricultural and rural policies hope to reasonably achieve to tackle the challenges faced by Asian countries today? Many of the countries in this region remain majority-rural, but their agricultural sector weighs much less in total GDP than it did just 10 years ago. The gap in labour productivity between agriculture and the rest of the economy is large and growing in most countries. Agriculture has undergone its own structural transformation with increasing shares of high-value crops in response to changing diets and export opportunities. Its capital intensity has increased at a rapid pace and so has the intensity with which it uses agrochemicals and water resources. Rural households are unquestionably deriving less than half of their income from farming and for the poorest households that percentage is even less; in fact, non-farm employment has grown across all Asia, a welcome development, particularly in South Asia, in the face of the reduced capacity of industry and services to offer jobs to the growing numbers of young people. These considerations, though, need to be balanced against the appreciation of agricultures linkages with the rest of the economy. When due consideration is given to the numerous forward and backward linkages shaping todays agrifood systems in Asia, we see that agriculture is a core component of a broader agrifood system on the performance of which the employment and income of a large part of the rural poor depend. For that agrifood system to grow over the long term and generate employment opportunities, though, agricultures competitiveness is a key precondition. So is agriculture successfully delivering on this specific role? 7 Agriculture remains a significant driver of poverty reduction in Asia, but the way in which its growth leads to less poverty is now changing rapidly. Reductions in poverty and malnutrition are increasingly associated with agricultures commercialization and the development of industries in the downstream rather than with the more traditional channel represented by farm income. In other words, agribusiness growth matters more than agricultural growth per se in todays Asia. While we are reassured that agriculture, as part of a broader agribusiness sector, retains a central role in rural development and poverty reduction, there needs to be a realization that its current mode of operation is contributing in an important way to the degradation of natural resources and the environment generally observed across the region. Unless a shift from the traditional Green Revolution paradigm to a more sustainable one is undertaken, there is a risk that, compounded by climate change, the degradation of the natural resource base will undermine the sectors prospects. Herein lies a major challenge for agricultures role in delivering on Agenda 2030 given the competitiveness-poverty-sustainability nexus. Furthermore, we see that this nexus is all the more challenging given the prominence of smallholder agriculture in Asia. Provided that smallholder agriculture is encouraged through the right mix of policies and investments, its contribution to the realization of Agenda 2030 will be undeniable. This report finds ground for a temperate optimism regarding the future role of smallholder agriculture in helping Asian countries delivering on Agenda 2030. Growth rates of the regions major economies remain buoyant. Notwithstanding the risks associated with a new global crisis or originating from the instability of financial markets, economic growth is expected to remain strong in the decade to come. This will have positive influences on the rural economy, including the rural non-farm sector, ensuring that it benefits from public investments in rural-urban connectivity made possible by healthier public finances. Asian rural financial markets are now better integrated with domestic financial markets, and through them with international financial markets, compared with only 10 years ago. Public policies have shifted from taxing to supporting agriculture so that incentives for agricultural producers are now relatively more favourable than those faced by other sectors of the economy. However, the report finds reason to moderate its optimism when it comes to climate change, perhaps todays most significant challenge for policymakers regarding the agricultural and rural transformation. Furthermore, Asian policymakers will increasingly be brought to face the difficulty of protecting smallholder agriculture while sustaining agricultures competitiveness. Land consolidation will emerge as a policy leitmotif in several Asian economies where surplus rural labour has been exhausted, rural wages are accelerating in the wake of the strong performance of industry and services, and the rural population is starting to decline in absolute terms (i.e. China and large parts of South-East Asia). Managing policies that simultaneously aim at supporting farm income and keeping the cost of agricultural commodities for agro-industries and consumers in check will be fiscally onerous. While land consolidation in Asias upper-middle-income countries will advance mainly in lowland areas cultivated with grains, this will be less the case in upland areas and in areas specializing in horticultural products. Upland areas may in fact lose population and witness growing tracts of idle lands given the limits to expanding farm size in these areas. Faced with pressures for land consolidation, policymakers could opt to have this driven either by the more competitive and entrepreneurial smallholders or by fully liberalizing land rental and sales markets and favouring large investors through attractive fiscal incentives. The choice will matter for the future of rural communities and the dynamics of rural-urban inequality, as in the latter case it is unlikely that the profits generated by the modernization of agriculture will be reinvested in the local economy.8 How should policymakers envision Asias pathways towards an inclusive and sustainable agricultural and rural transformation? First, an immediate consideration is that important shifts are taking place in national development policy in several Asian countries, in themselves self-standing agendas: the greening of growth, the scaling up of social protection programmes, the deepening of regional cooperation and trade (e.g. the Association of Southeast Asian Nations Economic Community), and the scaling up of nutrition. These increasingly influential development agendas will require a reconceptualization of agricultural and rural policies, given the multifarious roles that smallholder agriculture plays in each one of them. As the share of agriculture in GDP and that of farming in rural household income decline, the focus of agricultural and rural development policies will increasingly need to reflect the weight that society assigns to the quality of diets and of the environment, food safety, and equity. As the structural transformation deepens, the design of agricultural and rural policies will therefore become more complex rather than being simplified. Second, agricultural and rural policies will need to be fine-tuned to the broader stage of development achieved by a given country: the challenges and options will differ between those that are in the middle of their modernization efforts and those that are in the process of sustaining the gains from their earlier modernization efforts and are pressing ahead with the transformation agenda. Countries that are in the process of intensifying and modernizing their agriculture, the emphasis of agricultural and rural development strategies will be on fostering rural non-farm employment, strengthening the linkages to the agro-industrial sector, stabilizing food prices while increasing farm income, and increasing the efficiency in the use of natural resources in the production process. Countries that sustaining and deepening the transformation of their agriculture the emphasis will be on improving environmental quality, integrating lagging areas into the national economy, upgrading their agrifood value chains through a greater focus on food safety and environmental standards, and recognizing rural heritage as a key pillar of their national cultural identities. Third, specific investments and public interventions in the agricultural and rural economy will need to be modulated to the specific types of rural landscapes being targeted within each country. Such landscapes vary from those where agriculture is at an advanced stage of commercialization, to those where such commercialization is incipient in spite of the favourable agroecological conditions, to those characterized by abundant natural resources but limited production potential, particularly upland areas. While the role of the private sector will have a comparative advantage in leading the modernization of the commercially integrated productive areas, the existence of transaction costs rooted in underdeveloped market institutions and limited transportation and communication facilities imply a greater role of national governments and development partners. Resource-abundant but structurally food-deficit rural landscapes offer significant opportunities for local communities to realize the social value of natural resources through dedicated programmes and investments, including through agro-tourism and stewardship of ecologically fragile and cultural-rich territories. Although there is little role for agricultural and rural policies to lift people out of poverty in resource-scarce, food deficit areas, they do play a precious role of establishing viable local food systems on the basis of which policies aimed at an accelerated
展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索
资源标签

copyright@ 2017-2022 报告吧 版权所有
经营许可证编号:宁ICP备17002310号 | 增值电信业务经营许可证编号:宁B2-20200018  | 宁公网安备64010602000642